Call us to set up an appointment! 416-928-0003

MRIs - The Positives and the False Positives

Tests – what are they good for?

When it comes to back pain tests, of MRIs that question must be examined. What are MRIs good for when the percentage of helpful, influential MRI studies is so minor? False positive MRI results distress those who receive these results. They arouse fear or caution where it’s not always needed. MRIs like this blur the proper treatment plan. They spend a lot of money. Yorkville Chiropractic and Wellness Centre carefully evaluates the necessity of MRI in the Toronto chiropractic treatment plan of Toronto back pain relief.

MEDICINE’S VIEW

MRI interpretations by radiologists often differ.  The true-positive finding rate was 56.4%, and the miss-rate was 43.6%. (1) MRI imaging may trigger false suspicion. When following the guidelines of the American College of Radiology, 93% of lumbar spine MRIs were proper. Of those, only 13% revealed anything that needed to be addressed. Of the 36 MRIs that provoked suspicion of cancer or infection, 81% were false-positive. 59% of the follow-up MRIs on those suspicious findings were false positives. (2) MRI imaging may misinform. For example, MRI shows that the presence of disc degeneration in asymptomatic persons – persons with no back pain – rises with age:  37% in 20 year olds and 96% in 80 year olds; disc bulges: 30% to 84%; disc protrusion: 29% to 43%; annular fissures 19% to 29%. These imaging findings indicate that these are signs of normal aging. They remind all doctors, remind chiropractors like yours at Yorkville Chiropractic and Wellness Centre, to correlate all such findings to patient symptoms. (1,3) Your Toronto chiropractor does this!

CHIROPRACTIC’S VIEW

Choosing Wisely guidelines for American chiropractors suggest30 not repeating spinal imaging and not obtaining spinal imaging for patients with acute low back pain in the first 6 weeks of back pain (except when “red flags” are present– issues that suggest something more worrisome). (4) A review of the effectiveness of the Canadian Choosing Wisely recommendations for imaging nonspecific spinal pain and symptoms reported that there is very low risk of missing a worrying cause of back pain. (5) The objective of guidelines is less imaging, fewer false positives.  Yorkville Chiropractic and Wellness Centre wants what’s best for our Toronto chiropractic care patients.

COX® TECHNIC’S VIEW

Chiropractors like yours at Yorkville Chiropractic and Wellness Centre study all the symptoms, tests and images our Toronto chiropractic back pain patients [[present on|bring with them39] their first Toronto chiropractic visit. So many back pain patients come to Yorkville Chiropractic and Wellness Centre with MRI images already done. Yorkville Chiropractic and Wellness Centre will study them but will rely more on clinical exam findings and correlate them to what the MRI shows. A rule of thumb with the Cox Technic System of Back Pain Relief is to work toward 50% decrease of back pain in the first 30 days of care before arranging more imaging or testing or referring for surgical consultation. (6)

CONTACT Yorkville Chiropractic and Wellness Centre

Listen to this PODCAST with Dr. Dan Clark on the Back Doctor’s Podcast with Dr. Michael Johnson as he explains the role of imaging for back pain in the scheme of treatment for pain relief.

Schedule your Toronto chiropractic appointment with Yorkville Chiropractic and Wellness Centre today. Let us discover together the best path to Toronto back pain relief – with or without MRI imaging!

 
Yorkville Chiropractic and Wellness Centre carefully chooses when and if MRI images are needed to guide the Toronto chiropractic treatment plan.  
« View All Spine Articles
"This information and website content is not intended to diagnose, guarantee results, or recommend specific treatment or activity. It is designed to educate and inform only. Please consult your physician for a thorough examination leading to a diagnosis and well-planned treatment strategy. See more details on the DISCLAIMER page. Content is reviewed by Dr. James M. Cox I."